Reading
happened early, easily and often, but it wasn’t a collaborative experience. I read
alone and spent all my free time devouring books, systematically consuming any
author’s entire collection: Beverly Cleary, Judy Blume, Francine Pascal. One
summer afternoon, I stopped dead in the middle of a Nancy Drew mystery. I
realized, with shock, there was a formula! These books
revealed themselves to be the same story disguised in different characters and
settings. Carolyn Keene had duped me. Furthermore, I was disappointed: I still
had over 10 unread Nancy Drew books sitting on my corner shelf, awaiting
attention, but I couldn’t bring myself to finish them, bringing much guilt upon
myself. I was done with children’s books and went looking for more
sophisticated reading.
Reading in my
family’s house was not a sport for the cultivated or urbane. Trashy titles were
thoughtlessly thrown about the coffee table, and no one stopped me when I
picked up Sidney Sheldon’s The Other Side
of Midnight. A tween, I was thrilled
to be thrown into the abyss of adult literature; it was so corrupt, naughty,
and prurient. Whether my mother ever noticed I was reading this smut, I don’t
know, but I began another round of wolfing down as many books as Sheldon would
author and was immensely disappointed when I finished this list, so I moved
onto Danielle Steele and Mary Higgins Clark. Reading helped me escape from my
mother and unhappy family, a pastime she could not begrudge me
of. It was an escape that earned me nerd status among family and friends, but
it also gained me approval from adults, and I felt desperately grown up.
I truly identified
myself as a reader, easily excelling at reading in school and at home. However,
there was never any overt discussion about the different types of reading that one is
expected to do. The reading I was doing was purely escapist: I did not process
it or analyze it. Comprehension and plot, characterization and conflict were
ideas that I could easily discern, but frankly, if asked about themes
or symbols or irony or the social importance of a text, I’d be flummoxed. Reading obviously got more difficult in high school, when offerings like The Scarlet Letter and Moby Dick were on the menu. For
the first time in my life, I struggled with reading and I had no framework to
understand why. Suddenly, reading was no longer fun, easy, or enjoyable, but I
slogged through and managed to still be a good, effective reader, albeit a much
more unhappy one.
This very struggle, as I
see it today, led me to become a reluctant English major in college. There was
nothing else I was really good at or wanted to be, but I knew I was a fast and
good reader. So, I shrugged my shoulders and became an English major, barking
the caveat that “I don’t want to be a teacher” and “I am just doing it because
I can write papers instead of taking a test” to anyone who would listen. But at
college I found I had a knack for talking
about literature with others and could bang out a paper in a few hours. Once a
strong, independent reader, at college I discovered that I only thrived in an interactive, interpersonal environment. I’d
struggle if forced to analyze in isolation, and I constantly questioned my
literacy abilities. I felt less intelligent than my peers and fearfully avoided
classes like poetry and Shakespeare. I now see it was a lack of guidance that crippled me, and I wish I could go back and tell myself, “Jen, you
are an interpersonal learner who processes best verbally.” Knowing and
embracing that would have instilled a confidence that I would not have for
fifteen years to come.
A new shift in my
literacy and identity happened after college: I had become a reading snob,
thinking that as an English major, I should only engage with ‘real
literature’. And it was on a daily,
monotonous commute from Long Island to Manhattan that I saw everyone reading a
new author, John Grisham. I was disgusted; I would not read that trash. But the
commute was long and John Irving had just broken my heart with A Prayer for Owen Meany. I had to give
this Grisham a try. I confess: I was hooked. And thus, my literacy
identity throughout my mid-twenties was punctuated and defined by learning to
‘never say never’. This philosophy allowed me to intersperse my reading, to not
judge it. I could mull over Hamill’s Snow
in August and Calvino’s If on a
Winter’s Night a Traveler, but it was also okay to blow through each of
Grisham’s newly-published books. It allowed me to enjoy a bus ride in silence with
Groom’s Forrest Gump but to seek out
a book club to process my thoughts on Ondaatjee’s The English Patient or Schlink’s The Reader. It allowed me to
realize that of course I couldn’t understand Melville or Hawthorne in high
school! These complex novels created deep thematic schemas that were just
impossible for the undeveloped sixteen-year-old mind to comprehend without
facilitation.
I had the epiphany that there had to be better, more relevant ways to teach classic authors. Wait! Why only teach the classics
in high school? I fantasized about how to help real kids connect with fancy
books and deep ideas. Ultimately, on those cross-town bus rides, I began to
listen to that inner voice, the one that said, “Maybe, perhaps, you might
become an English teacher. Maybe you can make these books understandable,
relatable, and palatable to high school kids. Maybe you can even introduce them
to the cool contemporary books that you love so much.” And I did the distasteful and unthinkable thing: I became an English teacher.
I love this! I love the ending the best :)
ReplyDelete-Danielle
There are so many little pieces in here that mimic my own literacy experience. You have me thinking fondly of my own adolescent foray into the scandalous world of V.C. Andrews!
ReplyDeleteYou also have me thinking about that idea of scaffolding and framing reading for students. My students are just on the edge of the switch from reading for pleasure and escape to reading for analysis. I want to remember how we suffer when we aren't taught how to make that switch.
Thank you for sharing!
I totally had the same struggle in high school. I, too, need to talk about literature and that was prohibited in school. It drowned my love for books. I also agree with Kathryn with transitioning the students into reading for analysis. Its so very important.
ReplyDelete